On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 20:14:17 +0200
Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> wrote:


> And I forgot to mention, given that the kernel_thread() callback should
> call do_exit() itself, then this part of cc3b13c11c567c69a63
> 
>       one case when a kernel thread can reach the
>       usual syscall exit tracing path: when we create a kernel thread, the
>       child comes to ret_from_fork
> 
> is no longer relevant? A PF_KTHREAD child should never return from the
> callback and thus it should never do "jmp syscall_exit" ?
> 

Are you sure. On set up of the kthread, create_kthread() calls
kernel_thread() with "kthread()" as its first parameter.

kernel_thread() then calls do_fork() passing the "kthread" function as
the stack_start parameter, which if you follow where that goes, it gets
to copy_thread() in process_[63][42].c which assigns sp (the function)
to the bx register for the PF_KTHREAD case. But more importantly, it
sets up the stack to have ip pointing to ret_from_kernel_thread (32 bit
version).

The jmp syscall_exit when it goes to return to "userspace" will in
actuality return to ret_from_kernel_thread (32 bit). Which this does:

        call *PT_EBX(%esp)

which calls your handler. But then again, this calls syscall_exit when
done, which probably will never be hit as kthread() calls do_exit()
itself. Perhaps if something goes wrong, syscall_exit can handle any
faults that can happen?

For 64 bit, the check for kernel thread is in ret_from_fork itself.
which does the call *%rbx, but again, if it fails, it then calls
int_ret_from_sys_call, which it may also handle faults.

Looks like kernel threads on 32bit call syscall exit at least once, to
get to ret_from_kernel_thread. Not sure why it does that. Perhaps this
could be another 32bit clean up to make it more like x86_64.

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to