On Sun, 13 Apr 2014 21:56:17 +0200
Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> wrote:

> 1. Remove CLONE_KERNEL, it has no users and it is dangerous.
> 
>    The (old) comment says "List of flags we want to share for kernel
>    threads" but this is not true, we do not want to share ->sighand by
>    default. This flag can only be used if the caller is sure that both
>    parent/child will never play with signals (say, allow_signal/etc).
> 
> 2. Change rest_init() to clone kernel_init() without CLONE_SIGHAND.
> 
>    In this case CLONE_SIGHAND does not really hurt, and it looks like
>    optimization because copy_sighand() can avoid kmem_cache_alloc().
> 
>    But in fact this only adds the minor pessimization. kernel_init()
>    is going to exec the init process, and de_thread() will need to
>    unshare ->sighand and do kmem_cache_alloc(sighand_cachep) anyway,
>    but it needs to do more work and take tasklist_lock and siglock.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com>
> ---

Looks fine to me.

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to