Only workqueues have freezable or freezing attribution/state, not worker pools.
But POOL_FREEZING adds a suspicious state and makes reviewers confused.

And it causes freeze_workqueues_begin() and thaw_workqueues() much complicated,
they need to travel all the pools besides wqs.

Since freezable is workqueue instance's attribution, and freezing
is workqueue instance's state, so we introduce __WQ_FREEZING
to wq->flags instead and remove POOL_FREEZING.

It is different from POOL_FREEZING, POOL_FREEZING is simply set
all over the world(all pools), while __WQ_FREEZING is only set for freezable wq.
freeze_workqueues_begin()/thaw_workqueues() skip to handle non-freezable wqs
and don't touch the non-freezable wqs' flags.

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <la...@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 include/linux/workqueue.h |    1 +
 kernel/workqueue.c        |   38 ++++++++++++--------------------------
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/workqueue.h b/include/linux/workqueue.h
index 1b22c42..6bf353e 100644
--- a/include/linux/workqueue.h
+++ b/include/linux/workqueue.h
@@ -322,6 +322,7 @@ enum {
 
        __WQ_DRAINING           = 1 << 16, /* internal: workqueue is draining */
        __WQ_ORDERED            = 1 << 17, /* internal: workqueue is ordered */
+       __WQ_FREEZING           = 1 << 18, /* internel: workqueue is freezing */
 
        WQ_MAX_ACTIVE           = 512,    /* I like 512, better ideas? */
        WQ_MAX_UNBOUND_PER_CPU  = 4,      /* 4 * #cpus for unbound wq */
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index c3f076f..beca98b 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -70,7 +70,6 @@ enum {
         */
        POOL_MANAGE_WORKERS     = 1 << 0,       /* need to manage workers */
        POOL_DISASSOCIATED      = 1 << 2,       /* cpu can't serve workers */
-       POOL_FREEZING           = 1 << 3,       /* freeze in progress */
 
        /* worker flags */
        WORKER_STARTED          = 1 << 0,       /* started */
@@ -3662,9 +3661,6 @@ static struct worker_pool *get_unbound_pool(const struct 
workqueue_attrs *attrs)
        if (!pool || init_worker_pool(pool) < 0)
                goto fail;
 
-       if (workqueue_freezing)
-               pool->flags |= POOL_FREEZING;
-
        lockdep_set_subclass(&pool->lock, 1);   /* see put_pwq() */
        copy_workqueue_attrs(pool->attrs, attrs);
 
@@ -3762,7 +3758,7 @@ static void pwq_adjust_max_active(struct pool_workqueue 
*pwq)
        struct workqueue_struct *wq = pwq->wq;
        bool freezable = wq->flags & WQ_FREEZABLE;
 
-       /* for @wq->saved_max_active */
+       /* for @wq->saved_max_active and @wq->flags */
        lockdep_assert_held(&wq->mutex);
 
        /* fast exit for non-freezable wqs */
@@ -3771,7 +3767,7 @@ static void pwq_adjust_max_active(struct pool_workqueue 
*pwq)
 
        spin_lock_irq(&pwq->pool->lock);
 
-       if (!freezable || !(pwq->pool->flags & POOL_FREEZING)) {
+       if (!freezable || !(wq->flags & __WQ_FREEZING)) {
                pwq->max_active = wq->saved_max_active;
 
                while (!list_empty(&pwq->delayed_works) &&
@@ -4277,6 +4273,8 @@ struct workqueue_struct *__alloc_workqueue_key(const char 
*fmt,
        mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
 
        mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
+       if ((wq->flags & WQ_FREEZABLE) && workqueue_freezing)
+               wq->flags |= __WQ_FREEZING;
        for_each_pwq(pwq, wq)
                pwq_adjust_max_active(pwq);
        mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
@@ -4883,26 +4881,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(work_on_cpu);
  */
 void freeze_workqueues_begin(void)
 {
-       struct worker_pool *pool;
        struct workqueue_struct *wq;
        struct pool_workqueue *pwq;
-       int pi;
 
        mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
 
        WARN_ON_ONCE(workqueue_freezing);
        workqueue_freezing = true;
 
-       /* set FREEZING */
-       for_each_pool(pool, pi) {
-               spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
-               WARN_ON_ONCE(pool->flags & POOL_FREEZING);
-               pool->flags |= POOL_FREEZING;
-               spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
-       }
-
        list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list) {
+               if (!(wq->flags & WQ_FREEZABLE))
+                       continue;
                mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
+               WARN_ON_ONCE(wq->flags & __WQ_FREEZING);
+               wq->flags |= __WQ_FREEZING;
                for_each_pwq(pwq, wq)
                        pwq_adjust_max_active(pwq);
                mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
@@ -4970,25 +4962,19 @@ void thaw_workqueues(void)
 {
        struct workqueue_struct *wq;
        struct pool_workqueue *pwq;
-       struct worker_pool *pool;
-       int pi;
 
        mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
 
        if (!workqueue_freezing)
                goto out_unlock;
 
-       /* clear FREEZING */
-       for_each_pool(pool, pi) {
-               spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
-               WARN_ON_ONCE(!(pool->flags & POOL_FREEZING));
-               pool->flags &= ~POOL_FREEZING;
-               spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
-       }
-
        /* restore max_active and repopulate worklist */
        list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list) {
+               if (!(wq->flags & WQ_FREEZABLE))
+                       continue;
                mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
+               WARN_ON_ONCE(!(wq->flags & __WQ_FREEZING));
+               wq->flags &= ~__WQ_FREEZING;
                for_each_pwq(pwq, wq)
                        pwq_adjust_max_active(pwq);
                mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
-- 
1.7.4.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to