On Tue, 22 Apr 2014, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, April 22, 2014 08:15:41 AM Lee Jones wrote: > > > The cpufreq core now supports the cpufreq_for_each_entry macro helper > > > for iteration over the cpufreq_frequency_table, so use it. > > > > > > It should have no functional changes. > > > > > Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > > It would be good to have a changelog which describes the differences > > between the versions, so we can keep track. > > > > > drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c | 19 ++++++++----------- > > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > > > So it looks like I already applied v2 of this patch to my tree. What > > changed in v3 and v4? Should I remove that patch from MFD and apply > > this one instead? > > The reason why v4 was sent is because I asked for it. > > And if you applied [5/8] without [1/8], it won't work, because the macro is > introduced by that patch.
That's right, which is why I mailed you about it: > > > Applied untested by me. > > > > Wouldn't build. Let it go via Rafael. > > Rafael, would you mind creating a branch from this patch set that we > can both pull from please? > If that's the case, please drop [5/8] and let me handle the entire series. I'm happy for you to apply the series and send me a pull-request for either a) the entire series or b) just the patches which touch MFD and any subsequent decencies. Or I can apply them and send you one. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
