> > > The cpufreq core now supports the cpufreq_for_each_entry macro helper > > > for iteration over the cpufreq_frequency_table, so use it. > > > > > > It should have no functional changes. > > > > > Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > > It would be good to have a changelog which describes the differences > > between the versions, so we can keep track. > > > > > drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c | 19 ++++++++----------- > > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > > > So it looks like I already applied v2 of this patch to my tree. What > > changed in v3 and v4? Should I remove that patch from MFD and apply > > this one instead? > > I'm sorry for the confusion. > I sent v3 only for patches 1/8 and 3/8. > So, I was asked by Rafael to resend the entire series as v4 > in order to be clear which is the latest version in each patch. > Unfortunately, I omit the change log :( > > The specific patch (5/8) is unchanged since v2. > > I'm sorry for the inconvenience.
That's okay, thanks for clarifying. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
