On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 05:06:21PM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote: SNIP
> > That is probably the behaviour we both expect. > > > > Jiri's patch takes all mmap events as pid maps and creates an initial map > > for them. All future threads that don't have mappings will trying to use > > their pid's mapping as a fallback option. > > > > Because it is all pointer based now, updating the pid mappings > > automatically update all the thread mappings too. > > > > I believe this approach will is the right one and makes sense. Do you > > think that works for you? > > > I just tried Jiri's 5 patches and my JIT patches, and it does work correctly. > My Java samples are correctly symbolized. So looks like we have a solution > that works for both of us though it seems complicated. But I can live with it. > Thanks Jiri. can I take this for your Tested-by? thanks, jirka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
