On 04/25, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > Jim, I see your email about the previous series. If we rename ->def then > this series obviously should be updated too, but this is trivial.
Better yet, can't we rename it in a separate patch? I agree, ->def doesn't look good. So far I am inclined to make it ->dflt, although let me repeat I agree with any naming and I can use "dfault" as you suggested. But. If we rename it, then we should probably also rename default_xol_ops and its methods accordingly, and I think that "cosmetic, renames only" patch makes more sense. OK? Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
