Il 28/04/2014 17:03, Oleg Nesterov ha scritto:
async_pf_execute() passes tsk == current to gup(), this is doesn't
hurt but unnecessary and misleading. "tsk" is only used to account
the number of faults and current is the random workqueue thread.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com>
---
 virt/kvm/async_pf.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/async_pf.c b/virt/kvm/async_pf.c
index 0ced4f3..62f4223 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/async_pf.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/async_pf.c
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static void async_pf_execute(struct work_struct *work)
        might_sleep();

        down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
-       get_user_pages(current, mm, addr, 1, 1, 0, NULL, NULL);
+       get_user_pages(NULL, mm, addr, 1, 1, 0, NULL, NULL);
        up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
        kvm_async_page_present_sync(vcpu, apf);



Thanks, added a Suggested-by for Andrea and applied together with 1/2 to kvm/queue.

(Actually, I'm back from a longish vacation and I have a pretty large queue, so I haven't even compile tested these for now. Once I get round to at least smoke-test them, I'll really push to kvm/queue).

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to