Hi Al,

Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got a conflict in fs/f2fs/file.c
between commit adeb670f1fee ("f2fs: introduce f2fs_seek_block to support
SEEK_{DATA, HOLE} in llseek") from the f2fs tree and commits 8eb02141b8a6
("switch simple generic_file_aio_read() users to ->read_iter()") and
e6552301fb08 ("write_iter variants of {__,}generic_file_aio_write()")
from the vfs tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    s...@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc fs/f2fs/file.c
index b9f4fbf5c07e,e4ba4b93f96a..000000000000
--- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
@@@ -802,11 -678,11 +802,11 @@@ long f2fs_compat_ioctl(struct file *fil
  #endif
  
  const struct file_operations f2fs_file_operations = {
 -      .llseek         = generic_file_llseek,
 +      .llseek         = f2fs_llseek,
-       .read           = do_sync_read,
-       .write          = do_sync_write,
-       .aio_read       = generic_file_aio_read,
-       .aio_write      = generic_file_aio_write,
+       .read           = new_sync_read,
+       .write          = new_sync_write,
+       .read_iter      = generic_file_read_iter,
+       .write_iter     = generic_file_write_iter,
        .open           = generic_file_open,
        .mmap           = f2fs_file_mmap,
        .fsync          = f2fs_sync_file,

Attachment: pgpZCXPzu3aeS.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to