On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 03:09:01PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> +static inline bool rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> +{
> +     int retval;
> +     struct task_struct *owner;
> +
> +     rcu_read_lock();
> +     owner = ACCESS_ONCE(sem->owner);
> +
> +     /* Spin only if active writer running */
> +     if (owner)
> +             retval = owner->on_cpu;
> +     else {
> +             /*
> +              * When the owner is not set, the sem owner may have just
> +              * acquired it and not set the owner yet, or the sem has
> +              * been released, or reader active.
> +              */
> +             retval = false;
> +     }
> +     rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> +     return retval;
> +}

Also, the mutex case has a need_resched() test in there; any particular
reason you didn't mirror that?

See 46af29e479cc0 ("locking/mutexes: Return false if task need_resched() in 
mutex_can_spin_on_owner()")
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to