On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 11:14 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 03:09:01PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > +static inline bool rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> > +{
> > + int retval;
> > + struct task_struct *owner;
> > +
> > + rcu_read_lock();
> > + owner = ACCESS_ONCE(sem->owner);
> > +
> > + /* Spin only if active writer running */
> > + if (owner)
> > + retval = owner->on_cpu;
> > + else {
> > + /*
> > + * When the owner is not set, the sem owner may have just
> > + * acquired it and not set the owner yet, or the sem has
> > + * been released, or reader active.
> > + */
> > + retval = false;
> > + }
> > + rcu_read_unlock();
> > +
> > + return retval;
> > +}
>
> Also, the mutex case has a need_resched() test in there; any particular
> reason you didn't mirror that?
Good catch. I had made sure we have it in rwsem_optimistic_spin() but
overlooked this function, will update.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
