On Fri, 2 May 2014 19:13:48 +0100 Will Deacon <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Akashi, > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:54:29AM +0100, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > Most archs with HAVE_ARCH_CALLER_ADDR have the almost same definitions > > of CALLER_ADDRx(n), and so put them into linux/ftrace.h. > > > > Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <[email protected]> > > --- > > arch/arm/include/asm/ftrace.h | 10 +--------- > > arch/blackfin/include/asm/ftrace.h | 11 +---------- > > arch/parisc/include/asm/ftrace.h | 10 +--------- > > arch/sh/include/asm/ftrace.h | 10 +--------- > > arch/xtensa/include/asm/ftrace.h | 14 ++++---------- > > include/linux/ftrace.h | 34 > > ++++++++++++++++++---------------- > > 6 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-) > > This one looks a bit too widespread to be merged via the arm64 tree. I > wonder if the ftrace maintainers would consider taking it as a cleanup? > I actually was the one to recommend this approach. But I have some small comments to the patch. I'll reply directly to the patch with them. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
