I am not sure why we need the wrap_{max|min}() in kernel/sched/clock.c.
But I checked the implementation of max() and min() in linux/kernel.h, I think
we can reuse them here rather than introduce a new function named
wrap_{max|min}().

Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/sched/clock.c | 22 ++++------------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/clock.c b/kernel/sched/clock.c
index 3ef6451..36c03a8 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/clock.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/clock.c
@@ -173,20 +173,6 @@ void sched_clock_init(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * min, max except they take wrapping into account
- */
-
-static inline u64 wrap_min(u64 x, u64 y)
-{
-       return (s64)(x - y) < 0 ? x : y;
-}
-
-static inline u64 wrap_max(u64 x, u64 y)
-{
-       return (s64)(x - y) > 0 ? x : y;
-}
-
-/*
  * update the percpu scd from the raw @now value
  *
  *  - filter out backward motion
@@ -212,11 +198,11 @@ again:
         */
 
        clock = scd->tick_gtod + delta;
-       min_clock = wrap_max(scd->tick_gtod, old_clock);
-       max_clock = wrap_max(old_clock, scd->tick_gtod + TICK_NSEC);
+       min_clock = max(scd->tick_gtod, old_clock);
+       max_clock = max(old_clock, scd->tick_gtod + TICK_NSEC);
 
-       clock = wrap_max(clock, min_clock);
-       clock = wrap_min(clock, max_clock);
+       clock = max(clock, min_clock);
+       clock = min(clock, max_clock);
 
        if (cmpxchg64(&scd->clock, old_clock, clock) != old_clock)
                goto again;
-- 
1.8.2.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to