On Wed, 7 May 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:

> Factor out initialization of array cache to use it in following patch.
> 
> Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <c...@linux.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo....@lge.com>
> 

Acked-by: David Rientjes <rient...@google.com>

s/arracy/array/ in patch title.

> diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
> index 7647728..755fb57 100644
> --- a/mm/slab.c
> +++ b/mm/slab.c
> @@ -741,13 +741,8 @@ static void start_cpu_timer(int cpu)
>       }
>  }
>  
> -static struct array_cache *alloc_arraycache(int node, int entries,
> -                                         int batchcount, gfp_t gfp)
> +static void init_arraycache(struct array_cache *ac, int limit, int batch)
>  {
> -     int memsize = sizeof(void *) * entries + sizeof(struct array_cache);
> -     struct array_cache *nc = NULL;
> -
> -     nc = kmalloc_node(memsize, gfp, node);
>       /*
>        * The array_cache structures contain pointers to free object.
>        * However, when such objects are allocated or transferred to another
> @@ -755,15 +750,25 @@ static struct array_cache *alloc_arraycache(int node, 
> int entries,
>        * valid references during a kmemleak scan. Therefore, kmemleak must
>        * not scan such objects.
>        */
> -     kmemleak_no_scan(nc);
> -     if (nc) {
> -             nc->avail = 0;
> -             nc->limit = entries;
> -             nc->batchcount = batchcount;
> -             nc->touched = 0;
> -             spin_lock_init(&nc->lock);
> +     kmemleak_no_scan(ac);
> +     if (ac) {
> +             ac->avail = 0;
> +             ac->limit = limit;
> +             ac->batchcount = batch;
> +             ac->touched = 0;
> +             spin_lock_init(&ac->lock);
>       }
> -     return nc;
> +}
> +
> +static struct array_cache *alloc_arraycache(int node, int entries,
> +                                         int batchcount, gfp_t gfp)
> +{
> +     int memsize = sizeof(void *) * entries + sizeof(struct array_cache);

const?

> +     struct array_cache *ac = NULL;
> +
> +     ac = kmalloc_node(memsize, gfp, node);

I thought nc meant node cache, but I agree that ac is clearer.

> +     init_arraycache(ac, entries, batchcount);
> +     return ac;
>  }
>  
>  static inline bool is_slab_pfmemalloc(struct page *page)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to