On 14-05-07 07:50 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> The loops_per_jiffy count continues to be updated as each CPU is
> brought up.  This causes problems when we've got an HMP system and
> different CPUs have different loops per jiffy.  On exynos 542x
> systems, for instance, the A7s will have significantly lower loops per
> jiffy than their big brothers.

Based on the other discussion for the ARM variant of this, I'm
assuming this also becomes a WFC issue.  And if not, then it
probably should go by John or similar ; getmaintainers is just
being dumb in spitting my name out, since I only made one
trivial change to this file a year ago or similar.

P.
--

> 
> We should always set the loops_per_jiffy the first time through, then
> use the max.
> 
> One could argue that complex HMP systems should really be completely
> ignoring the global loops_per_jiffy variable anyway.  That's probably
> why nobody has fixed this before.  With that argument you could say
> that while this change isn't incorrect, it's a bit misguided.  Still,
> it doesn't hurt and provides a better fallback than we had without
> this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <diand...@chromium.org>
> ---
>  init/calibrate.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/init/calibrate.c b/init/calibrate.c
> index 520702d..073bf9b 100644
> --- a/init/calibrate.c
> +++ b/init/calibrate.c
> @@ -265,40 +265,44 @@ unsigned long __attribute__((weak)) 
> calibrate_delay_is_known(void)
>  void calibrate_delay(void)
>  {
>       unsigned long lpj;
> -     static bool printed;
> +     static bool already_ran;
>       int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
>  
>       if (per_cpu(cpu_loops_per_jiffy, this_cpu)) {
>               lpj = per_cpu(cpu_loops_per_jiffy, this_cpu);
> -             if (!printed)
> +             if (!already_ran)
>                       pr_info("Calibrating delay loop (skipped) "
>                               "already calibrated this CPU");
>       } else if (preset_lpj) {
>               lpj = preset_lpj;
> -             if (!printed)
> +             if (!already_ran)
>                       pr_info("Calibrating delay loop (skipped) "
>                               "preset value.. ");
> -     } else if ((!printed) && lpj_fine) {
> +     } else if ((!already_ran) && lpj_fine) {
>               lpj = lpj_fine;
>               pr_info("Calibrating delay loop (skipped), "
>                       "value calculated using timer frequency.. ");
>       } else if ((lpj = calibrate_delay_is_known())) {
>               ;
>       } else if ((lpj = calibrate_delay_direct()) != 0) {
> -             if (!printed)
> +             if (!already_ran)
>                       pr_info("Calibrating delay using timer "
>                               "specific routine.. ");
>       } else {
> -             if (!printed)
> +             if (!already_ran)
>                       pr_info("Calibrating delay loop... ");
>               lpj = calibrate_delay_converge();
>       }
>       per_cpu(cpu_loops_per_jiffy, this_cpu) = lpj;
> -     if (!printed)
> +     if (!already_ran) {
>               pr_cont("%lu.%02lu BogoMIPS (lpj=%lu)\n",
>                       lpj/(500000/HZ),
>                       (lpj/(5000/HZ)) % 100, lpj);
>  
> -     loops_per_jiffy = lpj;
> -     printed = true;
> +             loops_per_jiffy = lpj;
> +     } else {
> +             loops_per_jiffy = max(loops_per_jiffy, lpj);
> +     }
> +
> +     already_ran = true;
>  }
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to