On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 05:48:38PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 03:11:39PM -0700, j...@joshtriplett.org wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 05:25:20PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > > > > > The reaction of kvm-recheck.sh is obscure at best, and easy to miss > > > completely. This commit therefore prints "BUG: Build failed" in the > > > summary at the end of a run. > > > > This commit also changes a dozen other things about the output that this > > commit message does not document. :) > > Well, I don't know about a dozen, but I did upgrade the commit message to > read as follows: > > The reaction of kvm-recheck.sh is obscure at best, and easy to > miss completely. This commit therefore prints "BUG: Build failed" > in the summary at the end of a run. This commit also adds the > line of dashes in cases where performance info is not available, > and also avoids printing nonsense diagnostics in cases where > some of the normal test output is not available.
What about the change to kvm-test-1-run.sh? - Josh Triplett -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
