On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 15 May 2014 11:16, Inderpal Singh <inderpa...@samsung.com> wrote: >> I think I did not make myself clear. > > Probably I was the one who got confused :) > >> Devfreq will have its own opp table associated with its own device. It >> does not uses the opp table of cpus. >> Hence there may be need to free the table if driver (at least devfreq) >> getting un-registered. > > We may have an unregister routine routine, I am not arguing about that. > But we don't need to call that for CPU's opp, that's it.. For devices it might > make sense to free memory.
Yes the provision should be there in the OPP framework and let the individual drivers decide whether to invoke or not. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
