On Wed, 14 May 2014, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > > If I'm wrong, or we can restore the futex() call, great. If not... Should > > we keep the man-pages and document it as syscall(SYS_futex, ..., op, ...) ? > > +1, is there anything preventing adding a futex wrapper... glibc folks?
See what I said at <https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9712#c4> (with references to previous discussions). Someone needs to take the lead on pushing to consensus the question of what syscalls should have wrappers in glibc, and then implement the conclusions. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
