On 05/13/2014 10:27 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
Call __set_current_state() instead of assigning
the new state directly.
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidl...@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul <manf...@colorfullif.com>
---
ipc/msg.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ipc/msg.c b/ipc/msg.c
index 7ed1ef3..5a8489b 100644
--- a/ipc/msg.c
+++ b/ipc/msg.c
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ static int newque(struct ipc_namespace *ns, struct
ipc_params *params)
static inline void ss_add(struct msg_queue *msq, struct msg_sender *mss)
{
mss->tsk = current;
- current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
+ __set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
list_add_tail(&mss->list, &msq->q_senders);
}
@@ -976,7 +976,7 @@ long do_msgrcv(int msqid, void __user *buf, size_t bufsz, long msgtyp, int msgfl
else
msr_d.r_maxsize = bufsz;
msr_d.r_msg = ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN);
- current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
+ __set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
ipc_unlock_object(&msq->q_perm);
rcu_read_unlock();
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
