On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 12:34 AM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:19:07PM +0530, navin patidar wrote: >> > You have changed it to return _FAIL instead of true. Perhaps that is ok >> > but you need to explain it in the changelog. >> > >> oops, I'll resend this patch with proper changelog. >> I have one question, do i need to send v2 of whole patch series or >> just this patch. > > Greg, none of the other patches rely on this one. Could you apply them > and drop this one? This one is also fine except for the changelog but > Navin can send a new version in a new thread.
Please drop this patch. > [ General rules on redoing patches threads ] > > When you are sending a patch series and someone asks you to update one > changelog, then you can resend just the patch but you must set the > In-Reply-To email header. You didn't do that for [PATCH 13/28] so now > the v2 of that patch is in its own thread. Okay, I'll keep that in mind next time. > > If you are sending a patch series and updating one in the middle means > that the other patches won't apply then you should redo the whole thing > or ask Greg to apply the first 7 patches and redo the last ones. > > If you are sending a series and you have to update a lot of patches then > resend the whole thing because otherwise it becomes confusing. Thanks for explaining the process in detail. :) > [ This patch in particular ] > > Ok. So I looked at this and the function which calls > rtw_hal_intf_ps_func() is never called, so you're right that this > function isn't used. Probably this is what you were going to put in > your changelog and I would check and that's fine. > > But when I am reviewing these kinds of "delete unused code" patches then > I just "Ok. If there are still users the compile will break." So I > don't have to look outside the email client. So I would prefer if you > did it in this order: > > [patch 1/4] staging: rtl8188eu: Remove unused function rtw_interface_ps_func() > [patch 2/4] staging: rtl8188eu: Remove unused function rtw_hal_intf_ps_func() > [patch 3/4] staging: rtl8188eu: Remove unused function pointer > ->interface_ps_func > [patch 4/4] staging: rtl8188eu: staging: rtl8188eu: Remove unused function > rtl8188eu_ps_func() I'll send new patchset in order you mentioned. regards, navin patidar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
