On Mon, May 19 2014, Gioh Kim wrote:
> My point is atomic_pool should be able to work with/without CMA.

Agreed.

>> IMO, cma=0 command line argument should be supported, as should having
>> the default CMA size zero.  If CMA size is set to zero, kernel should
>> behave as if CMA was not enabled at compile time.

> It's also good if atomic_pool can work well with zero CMA size.

Exactly.

-- 
Best regards,                                         _     _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of      o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science,  Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz    (o o)
ooo +--<m...@google.com>--<xmpp:min...@jabber.org>--ooO--(_)--Ooo--

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to