(2014/05/19 23:58), Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On 05/17/2014 05:59 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> (2014/05/17 3:34), Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>>> Before this patch, users need to do this to fetch vex.vvvv:
>>>
>>>         if (insn->vex_prefix.nbytes == 2) {
>>>                 vex_vvvv = ((insn->vex_prefix.bytes[1] >> 3) & 0xf) ^ 0xf;
>>>         }
>>>         if (insn->vex_prefix.nbytes == 3) {
>>>                 vex_vvvv = ((insn->vex_prefix.bytes[2] >> 3) & 0xf) ^ 0xf;
>>>         }
>>>
>>> Make it so that insn->vex_prefix.bytes[2] always contains vex.wvvvvLpp bits.
>>
>> I like this hack :)
>> If you don't mind, please add inline functions to get such vex bits from
>> struct insn too?
> 
> I prefer to add such functionality when the first user surfaces:
> the needs of the user often dictate more suitable API.

OK, then this should be postponed until the actual user (uprobes)
appears.

> In this case (VEX insns), the API isn't that straightforward.
> For example, uprobe code narrowly escaped the need to detect maskmovq__
> (0f f7) and maskmovdqu (66 0f f7 or equivalent VEX) instructions.
> 
> Let's assume we do need to detect them.
> Merely fetching and looking at vex.mmmmm, vex.pp and opcode doesn't
> really help that much in detecting these instructions:
> with such simplistic help, user needs to check both VEX and legacy forms.
> 
> Perhaps a better API would be to form a word-sized "expanded opcode"
> for vector and VEX insns. Something along the lines of:
> 
> [x.mmmmm.pp.opcode__]
> 
> where x bit indicates XOP insn (as opposed to VEX), pp indicate
> none/66/F2/F3 prefixes, opcode__ is 8-bit opcode.
> then checking for maskmovFOO insns would be easier.

I see, but it also makes things complex just for special
instructions. I'd like to let decoder just decode it, not
elaborate.

Thank you,

-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Research Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to