On Tuesday 20 May 2014 20:01:01 Srikanth Thokala wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote:
> > On Sunday 18 May 2014 19:38:45 Srikanth Thokala wrote:
> >> +
> >> + if (cfg->ops->is_valid_cfg_access) {
> >> + if (!cfg->ops->is_valid_cfg_access(bus, devfn)) {
> >> + *val = PCI_CFG_INVALID_DEVFN;
> >> + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND;
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >
> > Can you explain why this callback is needed? If the space for the
> > bus is mapped, any access should just work.
>
> As I was explaining to Will, there are some controllers which doesn't
> return FF's
> when a device is not found on the bus (as per the PCI specification) and
> accessing such a device address from the kernel results in an external abort.
> So, I added this additional logic in my driver to bypass this and
> return FF's. Our IP
> and even other controllers like Tegra, Renesas have similar implementation.
> We cant think of a better solution and please let you us know if you
> have any inputs.
Does your hardware need this? My first response would otherwise be to
treat that as noncompliant and not handle this case in the generic
implementation.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
