On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 08:55:20PM +0800, Libo Chen wrote: > On 2014/5/27 17:48, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > In any case, I'm not sure what the 'regression' report is against, as > > there's only a single kernel version mentioned: 3.4, and that's almost a > upstream has the same problem, I have mentioned before. Not on anything that landed in my inbox I think, but that's not the point. For a regression report you need _2_ kernel versions, one with and one without the 'problem'. Providing one (or two) that have a problem doesn't qualify. In any case, I didn't see the original email, but I got the impression that it was complaining about 'new' behaviour from the bits I did see as quoted. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/