On Thursday 29 May 2014 03:24 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 29 May 2014 10:08:10 Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >> On Thursday 29 May 2014 10:01 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: >>> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Santosh Shilimkar >>> <santosh.shilim...@ti.com> wrote: >>>> On Wednesday 28 May 2014 09:32 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: >>> >>>>>> I suspect what you want is >>>>>> >>>>>> dma-ranges = <0x80000000 0 0x80000000>; >>>>>> >>>>>> to translate dma_addr_t 0x80000000-0xffffffff to phys_addr_t >>>>>> 0x0-0x7fffffff >>>>>> rather than phys_addr_t 0x800000000-0x87fffffff. >>>>> >>>> Interesting. Where does the ROM address space resides on integrator then >>>> considering >>>> address 0 is used for DMA. >>> >>> The ROM is at physical address 0x20000000, don't ask me >>> why >>> >>> The RAM is typically at 0x00000000-0x0fffffff, on up to four parallell >>> tiles, i.e. up to four completely independent CPUs are booted off the >>> same ROM and using a set of shared peripherals. >>> >> The reason I asked the question because most of the ARM SOC I came across >> aren't using the RAM phys address 0 and thought was because of boot >> architecture >> with ROM occupying that address with reset vector starting at address 0. >> >> That was one of the main reason we had description on max_*pfn on ARM w.r.t >> to other acrhes. >> >> Will corner ARM guys to understand bit more about it in some conference > > If this is anything like the versatile express, the reason it works is > probably > because there is another microcontroller in the system that does the bootstrap > and is able to load code into RAM before turning on the main CPU. > That make sense now. Thanks for those extra bits.
Regards, Santosh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
