On 30 May 2014 07:53, Russell King - ARM Linux <li...@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote: > NAK for all the reasons I mentioned in the previous submission in 2012. > > You partially did the right thing - you read through the previous > submission, and you said in your cover message that you had addressed > some of the comments from that submission. > > What I find extremely distasteful is that you seem to have chosen to > completely ignore my comments - you haven't mentioned them in your > covering message at all, and you've just gone ahead and converted ETM > and ETB to be platform devices. > > That gets you a NAK for that change, because you have done nothing what > so ever to address the concerns I raised.
>From my initial reading of your assessment it wasn't clear to me that your opinion leaned toward registering with the AMBA bus. Now that this point has been clarified I will go back to the AMBA interface for my next submission. Is there anything else not AMBA releated that you'd like to see modified? Thanks, Mathieu > > Since you seem to have ignored my comments, this is as far as I'm looking > at your submission, and you can consider the entire submission NAK'd by > me. > > Thanks. > > -- > FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: now at 9.7Mbps down 460kbps up... slowly > improving, and getting towards what was expected from it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/