Il giorno 30/mag/2014, alle ore 17:37, Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org> ha scritto:
> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:05:33AM +0200, Paolo Valente wrote: >> diff --git a/include/linux/cgroup_subsys.h b/include/linux/cgroup_subsys.h >> index 768fe44..cdd2528 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/cgroup_subsys.h >> +++ b/include/linux/cgroup_subsys.h >> @@ -39,6 +39,10 @@ SUBSYS(net_cls) >> SUBSYS(blkio) >> #endif >> >> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CGROUP_BFQIO) >> +SUBSYS(bfqio) >> +#endif > > So, ummm, I don't think this is a good idea. Why aren't you plugging > into the blkcg infrastructure as cfq does? Why does it need to be a > separate controller? > It does not, actually. It is just that when we implemented that part, there was no blkcg infrastructure. After that, I have gone on experimenting with the low-latency heuristics and all the other stuff. Finally I have decided to first propose this new version of bfq, and then deal also with blkcg integration in case of a positive welcome. Thanks, Paolo > Thanks. > > -- > tejun -- Paolo Valente Algogroup Dipartimento di Fisica, Informatica e Matematica Via Campi, 213/B 41125 Modena - Italy homepage: http://algogroup.unimore.it/people/paolo/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
