Acked-by: Srinivas Eeda <srinivas.e...@oracle.com>

On 06/01/2014 06:53 AM, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
There is a risk that the variable will be used without being initialized.

This was largely found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck.

Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqv...@spectrumdigital.se>
---
  fs/ocfs2/dir.c |    2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
index 0717662..27aa4a1 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
@@ -3738,7 +3738,7 @@ static int ocfs2_dx_dir_rebalance(struct ocfs2_super 
*osb, struct inode *dir,
        int credits, ret, i, num_used, did_quota = 0;
        u32 cpos, split_hash, insert_hash = hinfo->major_hash;
        u64 orig_leaves_start;
-       int num_dx_leaves;
+       int num_dx_leaves = 0;
        struct buffer_head **orig_dx_leaves = NULL;
        struct buffer_head **new_dx_leaves = NULL;
        struct ocfs2_alloc_context *data_ac = NULL, *meta_ac = NULL;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to