On Sun,  1 Jun 2014 15:53:04 +0200 Rickard Strandqvist 
<rickard_strandqv...@spectrumdigital.se> wrote:

> There is a risk that the variable will be used without being initialized.

um, no there isn't.

> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> @@ -3738,7 +3738,7 @@ static int ocfs2_dx_dir_rebalance(struct ocfs2_super 
> *osb, struct inode *dir,
>       int credits, ret, i, num_used, did_quota = 0;
>       u32 cpos, split_hash, insert_hash = hinfo->major_hash;
>       u64 orig_leaves_start;
> -     int num_dx_leaves;
> +     int num_dx_leaves = 0;
>       struct buffer_head **orig_dx_leaves = NULL;
>       struct buffer_head **new_dx_leaves = NULL;
>       struct ocfs2_alloc_context *data_ac = NULL, *meta_ac = NULL;

If ocfs2_dx_dir_kmalloc_leaves() returns non-zero, num_dx_leaves will
have been initialized.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to