On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 16:52 -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 01:49:50PM -0800, John Cherry wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 00:21 -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > > <snip> > > > compile time regressions we should be able to nail down fairly easily. > > > (someone from OSDL is already doing compile stats and such on each > release > > > [too bad they're mostly incomprehensible to the casual viewer]) > > > > Dave, I'm the "someone from OSDL". I agree that the compile stats and > > error/warning regresssions can be a little challenging to grock for the > > casual observer. Is it content or formatting that would help the casual > > viewer? > > I don't have one handy to quote from, but personally I find there > are two problems with what's currently presented. > > 1 - information overload. It's just a screenfull of numbers. > 2 - the column headings were non-obvious iirc. Or maybe I'm just dumb > and didn't look at them long enough. > > So it could just need some formatting tweaks to make it more > palatable.
This is not too difficult to do. I'll tweak the format a bit and see if it is more consumable. John > > Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
