On Thu, 5 Jun 2014, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 05 Jun 2014 15:28:32 -0000 > Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote: > > > > @@ -1112,7 +1134,8 @@ int rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_ > > return 1; > > } > > > > - ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, task, detect_deadlock); > > + /* We enforce deadlock detection for futexes */ > > + ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, task, 1); > > Why bother with passing in detect_deadlock then? > > Same goes for rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock().
Because that's part of the cleanup series to remove it and I did not want mix stuff here. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
