On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 16:23 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 3.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> 
> ------------------
> 
> From: Gavin Shan <gws...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> commit d0b4cc4e32705ff00d90d32da7783c266c702c04 upstream.
> 
> The incorrect register offset is passed to pci_wait_for_pending(), which is
> caused by commit 157e876ffe ("PCI: Add pci_wait_for_pending() (refactor
> pci_wait_for_pending_transaction())").
> 
> Fixes: 157e876ffe ("PCI: Add pci_wait_for_pending() (refactor 
> pci_wait_for_pending_transaction())
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gws...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelg...@google.com>
> Acked-by: Alex Williamson <alex.william...@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
> 
> ---
>  drivers/pci/pci.c |    5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -3043,7 +3043,8 @@ int pci_wait_for_pending_transaction(str
>       if (!pci_is_pcie(dev))
>               return 1;
>  
> -     return pci_wait_for_pending(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVSTA, PCI_EXP_DEVSTA_TRPND);
> +     return pci_wait_for_pending(dev, pci_pcie_cap(dev) + PCI_EXP_DEVSTA,
> +                                 PCI_EXP_DEVSTA_TRPND);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_wait_for_pending_transaction);
>  
> @@ -3085,7 +3086,7 @@ static int pci_af_flr(struct pci_dev *de
>               return 0;
>  
>       /* Wait for Transaction Pending bit clean */
> -     if (pci_wait_for_pending(dev, PCI_AF_STATUS, PCI_AF_STATUS_TP))
> +     if (pci_wait_for_pending(dev, pos + PCI_AF_STATUS, PCI_AF_STATUS_TP))
>               goto clear;
>  
>       dev_err(&dev->dev, "transaction is not cleared; "

This still seems to be broken because pci_wait_for_pending() does
pci_read_config_word() but PCI_AF_STATUS is not word-aligned.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Never attribute to conspiracy what can adequately be explained by stupidity.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to