On 2014/6/10 7:19, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jun 2014, Jiang Liu wrote:
> 
>> Function mp_register_gsi() may return invalid GSI if error happens,
>> so enhance acpi_register_gsi() to handle possible error cases.
> 
> Can you please explain how that happens? I think I know it, but it'd
> be nice if it would be documented.
Sure.

> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang....@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c |   10 ++++++----
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
>> index 392360c607dc..f201579cd0df 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
>> @@ -97,6 +97,8 @@ static u32 isa_irq_to_gsi[NR_IRQS_LEGACY] __read_mostly = {
>>      0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
>>  };
>>  
>> +#define     ACPI_INVALID_GSI                INT_MIN
>> +
>>  static unsigned int gsi_to_irq(unsigned int gsi)
>>  {
>>      unsigned int irq = gsi + NR_IRQS_LEGACY;
>> @@ -441,7 +443,7 @@ static int mp_register_gsi(struct device *dev, u32 gsi, 
>> int trigger,
>>                           polarity == ACPI_ACTIVE_HIGH ? 0 : 1);
>>      ret = io_apic_set_pci_routing(dev, gsi_to_irq(gsi), &irq_attr);
>>      if (ret < 0)
>> -            gsi = INT_MIN;
>> +            gsi = ACPI_INVALID_GSI;
>>  
>>      return gsi;
>>  }
>> @@ -666,13 +668,13 @@ int (*acpi_suspend_lowlevel)(void);
>>   */
>>  int acpi_register_gsi(struct device *dev, u32 gsi, int trigger, int 
>> polarity)
>>  {
>> -    unsigned int irq;
>>      unsigned int plat_gsi = gsi;
> 
> The assignemend of gsi to plat_gsi is pointless
This was done in patch 21. And eventually function acpi_register_gsi()
will be simplified as below by patch 21 and 22.
int acpi_register_gsi(struct device *dev, u32 gsi, int trigger, int
polarity)
{
        return (*__acpi_register_gsi)(dev, gsi, trigger, polarity);
}

I will rework and resend patch 8, 21 and 22.
>   
>>      plat_gsi = (*__acpi_register_gsi)(dev, gsi, trigger, polarity);
> 
> __acpi_register_gsi is a function pointer, so
> 
>       plat_gsi = __acpi_register_gsi(dev, gsi, trigger, polarity);
> 
> is completely correct and way simpler to read.
Thanks, will change to the simpler way.

> 
>> -    irq = gsi_to_irq(plat_gsi);
>> +    if (plat_gsi != ACPI_INVALID_GSI)
>> +            return gsi_to_irq(plat_gsi);
>>  
>> -    return irq;
>> +    return -1;
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_register_gsi);
> 
> No need to repost the whole series. Just reply with a new version to
> this.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>       tglx
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to