On 06/06/2014 03:05 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
On 05/30/2014 10:07 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
On Fri 30-05-14 09:58:14, Peter Hurley wrote:
On 05/30/2014 09:11 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
Hi all,

I sometime see lockups when booting my KVM guest with the latest -next kernel,
it basically hangs right when it should start 'init', and after a while I get
the following spew:

[   30.790833] BUG: spinlock lockup suspected on CPU#1, swapper/1/0

Maybe related to this report: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/30/26
from Jet Chen which was bisected to

commit bafe980f5afc7ccc693fd8c81c8aa5a02fbb5ae0
Author:     Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>
AuthorDate: Thu May 22 10:43:35 2014 +1000
Commit:     Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au>
CommitDate: Thu May 22 10:43:35 2014 +1000

     printk: enable interrupts before calling console_trylock_for_printk()
         We need interrupts disabled when calling console_trylock_for_printk() 
only
     so that cpu id we pass to can_use_console() remains valid (for other
     things console_sem provides all the exclusion we need and deadlocks on
     console_sem due to interrupts are impossible because we use
     down_trylock()).  However if we are rescheduled, we are guaranteed to run
     on an online cpu so we can easily just get the cpu id in
     can_use_console().
         We can lose a bit of performance when we enable interrupts in
     vprintk_emit() and then disable them again in console_unlock() but OTOH it
     can somewhat reduce interrupt latency caused by console_unlock()
     especially since later in the patch series we will want to spin on
     console_sem in console_trylock_for_printk().
         Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>
     Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>

?
   Yeah, very likely. I think I see the problem, I'll send the fix shortly.

Hi Jan,

It seems that the issue I'm seeing is different from the "[prink]  BUG: spinlock
lockup suspected on CPU#0, swapper/1".

Is there anything else I could try here? The issue is very common during 
testing.

Sasha,

Is this bisectable? Maybe that's the best way forward here.

Regards,
Peter Hurley

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to