On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Linus Torvalds
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Ok, I'm going to revert that commit. The games it plays with cpu
> numbers and preemption make me worried, and it looks silly.
>
> If the only reason for that patch is interrupt latency, then if the
> "preempt_disable()" had been done *before* restoring irq's, none of
> those "let's reload the CPU number" games would have been necessary,
> and the patch could have been smaller.
Ugh. It doesn't revert cleanly, so I guess I'm not just reverting it
after all. Jan?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
