On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 02:05:18PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 01:59:33PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > That tree has the not-for-linus raid6 fix and the not-for-linus i8042 fix. > > Then when the authors of those patches go to submit the fix to Linus, > they can revert them, or bk can handle the merge properly :)
How about having two BK trees - one containing "fixes for Linus" and the other "fixes not for Linus but we really need" ? The "sucker tree" then becomes the two merged together. This way, Linus would never see the "fixes not for Linus" at all. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
