On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:04:42 +0000
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com> wrote:

> Simplify ftrace_hash_disable/enable path in ftrace_hash_move
> for hardening the process if the memory allocation failed.
> 

Regardless of what we do with IPMODIFY, I pulled this into my 3.17
queue. You don't need to resend it with any new versions of the patches.

-- Steve

> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org>
> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoim...@redhat.com>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org>
> ---
>  kernel/trace/ftrace.c |   33 +++++++++++----------------------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> index 5b372e3..d65719d 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> @@ -1304,25 +1304,15 @@ ftrace_hash_move(struct ftrace_ops *ops, int enable,
>       struct ftrace_hash *new_hash;
>       int size = src->count;
>       int bits = 0;
> -     int ret;
>       int i;
>  
>       /*
> -      * Remove the current set, update the hash and add
> -      * them back.
> -      */
> -     ftrace_hash_rec_disable(ops, enable);
> -
> -     /*
>        * If the new source is empty, just free dst and assign it
>        * the empty_hash.
>        */
>       if (!src->count) {
> -             free_ftrace_hash_rcu(*dst);
> -             rcu_assign_pointer(*dst, EMPTY_HASH);
> -             /* still need to update the function records */
> -             ret = 0;
> -             goto out;
> +             new_hash = EMPTY_HASH;
> +             goto update;
>       }
>  
>       /*
> @@ -1335,10 +1325,9 @@ ftrace_hash_move(struct ftrace_ops *ops, int enable,
>       if (bits > FTRACE_HASH_MAX_BITS)
>               bits = FTRACE_HASH_MAX_BITS;
>  
> -     ret = -ENOMEM;
>       new_hash = alloc_ftrace_hash(bits);
>       if (!new_hash)
> -             goto out;
> +             return -ENOMEM;
>  
>       size = 1 << src->size_bits;
>       for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
> @@ -1349,20 +1338,20 @@ ftrace_hash_move(struct ftrace_ops *ops, int enable,
>               }
>       }
>  
> +update:
> +     /*
> +      * Remove the current set, update the hash and add
> +      * them back.
> +      */
> +     ftrace_hash_rec_disable(ops, enable);
> +
>       old_hash = *dst;
>       rcu_assign_pointer(*dst, new_hash);
>       free_ftrace_hash_rcu(old_hash);
>  
> -     ret = 0;
> - out:
> -     /*
> -      * Enable regardless of ret:
> -      *  On success, we enable the new hash.
> -      *  On failure, we re-enable the original hash.
> -      */
>       ftrace_hash_rec_enable(ops, enable);
>  
> -     return ret;
> +     return 0;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to