From: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>

This patch has been added to the 3.12 stable tree. If you have any
objections, please let us know.

===============

commit cadefd3d6cc914d95163ba1eda766bfe7ce1e5b7 upstream.

Mike reported that, while unlikely, its entirely possible for
scale_rt_power() to see the time go backwards. This yields rather
'interesting' results.

So like all other sites that deal with clocks; make this one ignore
backward clock movement too.

Reported-by: Mike Galbraith <bitbuc...@online.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
Link: 
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140227094035.gz9...@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jsl...@suse.cz>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 25658d2c68d0..898622244bdf 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4404,6 +4404,7 @@ static unsigned long scale_rt_power(int cpu)
 {
        struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
        u64 total, available, age_stamp, avg;
+       s64 delta;
 
        /*
         * Since we're reading these variables without serialization make sure
@@ -4412,7 +4413,11 @@ static unsigned long scale_rt_power(int cpu)
        age_stamp = ACCESS_ONCE(rq->age_stamp);
        avg = ACCESS_ONCE(rq->rt_avg);
 
-       total = sched_avg_period() + (rq_clock(rq) - age_stamp);
+       delta = rq_clock(rq) - age_stamp;
+       if (unlikely(delta < 0))
+               delta = 0;
+
+       total = sched_avg_period() + delta;
 
        if (unlikely(total < avg)) {
                /* Ensures that power won't end up being negative */
-- 
2.0.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to