Nadav Amit <na...@cs.technion.ac.il> writes:
> In two cases lapic.c does not use the apic_debug macro correctly. This patch
> fixes them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <na...@cs.technion.ac.il>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> index 0069118..3855103 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> @@ -1451,7 +1451,7 @@ void kvm_lapic_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> vcpu->arch.apic_arb_prio = 0;
> vcpu->arch.apic_attention = 0;
>
> - apic_debug(KERN_INFO "%s: vcpu=%p, id=%d, base_msr="
> + apic_debug("%s: vcpu=%p, id=%d, base_msr="
> "0x%016" PRIx64 ", base_address=0x%0lx.\n", __func__,
> vcpu, kvm_apic_id(apic),
> vcpu->arch.apic_base, apic->base_address);
> @@ -1895,7 +1895,7 @@ void kvm_apic_accept_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> /* evaluate pending_events before reading the vector */
> smp_rmb();
> sipi_vector = apic->sipi_vector;
> - pr_debug("vcpu %d received sipi with vector # %x\n",
> + apic_debug("vcpu %d received sipi with vector # %x\n",
Why don't we just use pr_debug all throughout ?
> vcpu->vcpu_id, sipi_vector);
> kvm_vcpu_deliver_sipi_vector(vcpu, sipi_vector);
> vcpu->arch.mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
