On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 04:41:03PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> d911d9874801 ("kernfs: make kernfs_notify() trigger inotify events
> too") added fsnotify triggering to kernfs_notify() which requires a
> sleepable context. There are already existing users of
> kernfs_notify() which invoke it from an atomic context and in general
> it's silly to require a sleepable context for triggering a
> notification.
>
> The following is an invalid context bug triggerd by md invoking
> sysfs_notify() from IO completion path.
>
> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
> kernel/locking/mutex.c:586
> in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 0, name: swapper/1
> 2 locks held by swapper/1/0:
> #0: (&(&vblk->vq_lock)->rlock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffffa0039042>]
> virtblk_done+0x42/0xe0 [virtio_blk]
> #1: (&(&bitmap->counts.lock)->rlock){-.....}, at: [<ffffffff81633718>]
> bitmap_endwrite+0x68/0x240
> irq event stamp: 33518
> hardirqs last enabled at (33515): [<ffffffff8102544f>]
> default_idle+0x1f/0x230
> hardirqs last disabled at (33516): [<ffffffff818122ed>]
> common_interrupt+0x6d/0x72
> softirqs last enabled at (33518): [<ffffffff810a1272>]
> _local_bh_enable+0x22/0x50
> softirqs last disabled at (33517): [<ffffffff810a29e0>] irq_enter+0x60/0x80
> CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 3.16.0-0.rc2.git2.1.fc21.x86_64 #1
> Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
> 0000000000000000 f90db13964f4ee05 ffff88007d403b80 ffffffff81807b4c
> 0000000000000000 ffff88007d403ba8 ffffffff810d4f14 0000000000000000
> 0000000000441800 ffff880078fa1780 ffff88007d403c38 ffffffff8180caf2
> Call Trace:
> <IRQ> [<ffffffff81807b4c>] dump_stack+0x4d/0x66
> [<ffffffff810d4f14>] __might_sleep+0x184/0x240
> [<ffffffff8180caf2>] mutex_lock_nested+0x42/0x440
> [<ffffffff812d76a0>] kernfs_notify+0x90/0x150
> [<ffffffff8163377c>] bitmap_endwrite+0xcc/0x240
> [<ffffffffa00de863>] close_write+0x93/0xb0 [raid1]
> [<ffffffffa00df029>] r1_bio_write_done+0x29/0x50 [raid1]
> [<ffffffffa00e0474>] raid1_end_write_request+0xe4/0x260 [raid1]
> [<ffffffff813acb8b>] bio_endio+0x6b/0xa0
> [<ffffffff813b46c4>] blk_update_request+0x94/0x420
> [<ffffffff813bf0ea>] blk_mq_end_io+0x1a/0x70
> [<ffffffffa00392c2>] virtblk_request_done+0x32/0x80 [virtio_blk]
> [<ffffffff813c0648>] __blk_mq_complete_request+0x88/0x120
> [<ffffffff813c070a>] blk_mq_complete_request+0x2a/0x30
> [<ffffffffa0039066>] virtblk_done+0x66/0xe0 [virtio_blk]
> [<ffffffffa002535a>] vring_interrupt+0x3a/0xa0 [virtio_ring]
> [<ffffffff81116177>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x77/0x340
> [<ffffffff8111647d>] handle_irq_event+0x3d/0x60
> [<ffffffff81119436>] handle_edge_irq+0x66/0x130
> [<ffffffff8101c3e4>] handle_irq+0x84/0x150
> [<ffffffff818146ad>] do_IRQ+0x4d/0xe0
> [<ffffffff818122f2>] common_interrupt+0x72/0x72
> <EOI> [<ffffffff8105f706>] ? native_safe_halt+0x6/0x10
> [<ffffffff81025454>] default_idle+0x24/0x230
> [<ffffffff81025f9f>] arch_cpu_idle+0xf/0x20
> [<ffffffff810f5adc>] cpu_startup_entry+0x37c/0x7b0
> [<ffffffff8104df1b>] start_secondary+0x25b/0x300
>
> This patch fixes it by punting the notification delivery through a
> work item. This ends up adding an extra pointer to kernfs_elem_attr
> enlarging kernfs_node by a pointer, which is not ideal but not a very
> big deal either. If this turns out to be an actual issue, we can move
> kernfs_elem_attr->size to kernfs_node->iattr later.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org>
> Reported-by: Josh Boyer <jwbo...@fedoraproject.org>
> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jens Axboe <ax...@kernel.dk>
> ---
> fs/kernfs/file.c | 69
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> include/linux/kernfs.h | 1
> 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
Looks good to me, do you want to take this with your other kernfs
patches for 3.16-final? Or if you don't have that, I can take it
through my tree, it's your choice, either is fine for me.
If you want it in your tree, feel free to add:
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
