> On Monday 30 June 2014 08:11 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > phy: miphy365x: Represent each PHY channel as a DT subnode
> >
> > This has the added advantages of being able to enable/disable each
> > of the channels as simply as enabling/disabling the DT node.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kis...@ti.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org>
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-miphy365x.c b/drivers/phy/phy-miphy365x.c
> > index 1109f42..2c4ea6e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/phy/phy-miphy365x.c
> > +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-miphy365x.c
[...]
> > -static int miphy365x_of_probe(struct device_node *np,
> > +static int miphy365x_of_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > struct miphy365x_dev *phy_dev)
> > {
> > + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> > + struct device_node *child;
> > + int child_count = 0;
> > +
> > + for_each_child_of_node(np, child)
> > + child_count++;
>
> use of_get_child_count() instead.
Ah, nice. I'll do that.
[...]
> I think you can merge this to your original patch.
I can do that, but I thought It'd be nice to keep some history and
show the migration over to a different setup. This is particularly
important for when we back-port the changes back into the internal
development kernel.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
