On Wednesday 02 July 2014 05:04 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On Monday 30 June 2014 08:11 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> phy: miphy365x: Represent each PHY channel as a DT subnode
>>>
>>> This has the added advantages of being able to enable/disable each
>>> of the channels as simply as enabling/disabling the DT node.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kis...@ti.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-miphy365x.c b/drivers/phy/phy-miphy365x.c
>>> index 1109f42..2c4ea6e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/phy/phy-miphy365x.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-miphy365x.c
>
> [...]
>
>>> -static int miphy365x_of_probe(struct device_node *np,
>>> +static int miphy365x_of_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
>>> struct miphy365x_dev *phy_dev)
>>> {
>>> + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>>> + struct device_node *child;
>>> + int child_count = 0;
>>> +
>>> + for_each_child_of_node(np, child)
>>> + child_count++;
>>
>> use of_get_child_count() instead.
>
> Ah, nice. I'll do that.
>
> [...]
>
>> I think you can merge this to your original patch.
>
> I can do that, but I thought It'd be nice to keep some history and
> show the migration over to a different setup. This is particularly
> important for when we back-port the changes back into the internal
> development kernel.
cool.. i'm fine with it.
Cheers
Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
