On 07/02/14 04:32, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c
> index 4273a5f..0c16b2f 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c
> @@ -151,7 +151,16 @@ static int cpu0_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> cpu_clk = clk_get(cpu_dev, NULL);
> if (IS_ERR(cpu_clk)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(cpu_clk);
> - pr_err("failed to get cpu0 clock: %d\n", ret);
> +
> + /*
> + * If cpu's clk node is present, but clock is not yet
> + * registered, we should try defering probe.
> + */
> + if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + dev_err(cpu_dev, "cpu0 clock not ready, retry\n");
Please make this a dev_dbg() or just remove it entirely. Sending a
message to the log on probe defer just duplicates what the driver core
is already doing.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
