On Wednesday 09 March 2005 11:04, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Marcos D. Marado Torres wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Greg KH wrote:
> > > which is a patch against the 2.6.11.1 release. If consensus arrives
> > > that this patch should be against the 2.6.11 tree, it will be done that
> > > way in the future.
> >
> > IMHO it sould be against 2.6.11 and not 2.6.11.1, like -rc's that are'nt
> > againt
> > the last -rc but against 2.6.x.
>
> It's a stable release, not a pre/rc, so against 2.6.11.1 sounds most
> logical to me.
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
I don't think so. The latest patch (2.6.11.2 now) is on the frontpage of
kernel.org, so IMHO the user should not need to search the kernel.org/pub
archives to get 2.6.11.1 patch before he can start working with 2.6.11.2.
I think it's a small problem too, that 2.6.11 source isn't directly accessable
through the kernel.org frontpage while there is no "full tarball" of 2.6.11.X
trees.
greetings,
dominik
pgpYWMU2JCtJQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
