On St 09-03-05 09:52:46, Marcos D. Marado Torres wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Greg KH wrote: > > >which is a patch against the 2.6.11.1 release. If consensus arrives > >that this patch should be against the 2.6.11 tree, it will be done that > >way in the future. > > IMHO it sould be against 2.6.11 and not 2.6.11.1, like -rc's that are'nt > againt > the last -rc but against 2.6.x.
You expect people to go through all 2.6.11.1, 2.6.11.2, ... . That means .11.2 should be relative to .11.1, because otherwise people will have to revert (ugly). And you want people to track -stable kernels as fast as possible. So Greg did it right. Pavel -- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/