The compiler can generate slightly smaller and simpler code when it
knows that "nbits" is non-negative. Since no-one passes a
negative bit-count, this shouldn't affect the semantics.

Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <li...@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
---
 include/linux/bitmap.h | 2 +-
 lib/bitmap.c           | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bitmap.h b/include/linux/bitmap.h
index bc7e520..1e0f46c 100644
--- a/include/linux/bitmap.h
+++ b/include/linux/bitmap.h
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@
 extern int __bitmap_empty(const unsigned long *bitmap, unsigned int nbits);
 extern int __bitmap_full(const unsigned long *bitmap, unsigned int nbits);
 extern int __bitmap_equal(const unsigned long *bitmap1,
-                       const unsigned long *bitmap2, int bits);
+                         const unsigned long *bitmap2, unsigned int nbits);
 extern void __bitmap_complement(unsigned long *dst, const unsigned long *src,
                        int bits);
 extern void __bitmap_shift_right(unsigned long *dst,
diff --git a/lib/bitmap.c b/lib/bitmap.c
index 9859f38..d6bb955 100644
--- a/lib/bitmap.c
+++ b/lib/bitmap.c
@@ -71,9 +71,9 @@ int __bitmap_full(const unsigned long *bitmap, unsigned int 
bits)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__bitmap_full);
 
 int __bitmap_equal(const unsigned long *bitmap1,
-               const unsigned long *bitmap2, int bits)
+               const unsigned long *bitmap2, unsigned int bits)
 {
-       int k, lim = bits/BITS_PER_LONG;
+       unsigned int k, lim = bits/BITS_PER_LONG;
        for (k = 0; k < lim; ++k)
                if (bitmap1[k] != bitmap2[k])
                        return 0;
-- 
1.9.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to