From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[email protected]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unify the spinlock initialization as far as possible.
Signed-off-by: Amit Gud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
linux-2.6.11-paolo/arch/um/drivers/port_kern.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN arch/um/drivers/port_kern.c~uml-switch-spinlock-init
arch/um/drivers/port_kern.c
--- linux-2.6.11/arch/um/drivers/port_kern.c~uml-switch-spinlock-init
2005-03-09 10:35:28.786848080 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.11-paolo/arch/um/drivers/port_kern.c 2005-03-09
10:35:28.789847624 +0100
@@ -185,11 +185,11 @@ void *port_data(int port_num)
.has_connection = 0,
.sem = __SEMAPHORE_INITIALIZER(port->sem,
0),
- .lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED,
.port = port_num,
.fd = fd,
.pending = LIST_HEAD_INIT(port->pending),
.connections = LIST_HEAD_INIT(port->connections) });
+ spin_lock_init(&port->lock);
list_add(&port->list, &ports);
found:
_
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
