On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 03:42:03PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > MAINTAINERS | 8 ++++++++ > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index 1814075c0e74..92f2bf91eec1 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -7405,6 +7405,9 @@ F: kernel/rcu/torture.c > > RCUTORTURE TEST FRAMEWORK > M: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > +R: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> > +R: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com> > +R: Lai Jiangshan <la...@cn.fujitsu.com> > L: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > S: Supported > T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git
OK,.. so if we're going to do this can we talk about the syntax here. I would like to also use this for SCHED and PERF, but since both are rather big I would like to be able to subdivide things. Now I could of course go create many MAINTAINER sections, but that feels artificial. So I would like to be able to write: SCHEDULER: ... R: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> (kernel/sched/rt.c) R: Juri Lelli <juri.le...@gmail.com> (kernel/sched/deadline.c) or something like that. And here I've already done concessions in that the above is machine readable. Ideally I'd be able to say things like: 'for sched and numa related things' add 'rik and mel'. Hmm, maybe we can look at the patch subject tag like: sched/numa or sched/rt or sched/deadline etc.. instead of the files touched.
pgpo9MJM2okLa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
