On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 07/10, Kees Cook wrote: >> >> This adds the ability for threads to request seccomp filter >> synchronization across their thread group (at filter attach time). >> For example, for Chrome to make sure graphic driver threads are fully >> confined after seccomp filters have been attached. >> >> To support this, locking on seccomp changes via thread-group-shared >> sighand lock is introduced, along with refactoring of no_new_privs. Races >> with thread creation are handled via delayed duplication of the seccomp >> task struct field and cred_guard_mutex. >> >> This includes a new syscall (instead of adding a new prctl option), >> as suggested by Andy Lutomirski and Michael Kerrisk. > > I do not not see any problems in this version,
Awesome! Thank you for all the reviews. :) If Andy and Michael are happy with this too, I think this is in good shape. \o/ -Kees > > Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> > -- Kees Cook Chrome OS Security -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
