It seems that the only purpose of call_filter_disable() is to
make filter_disable() less clear and symmetrical, remove it.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c |    7 +------
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c 
b/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
index 1edec32..54a125c 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
@@ -774,17 +774,12 @@ static void __free_preds(struct event_filter *filter)
        filter->n_preds = 0;
 }
 
-static void call_filter_disable(struct ftrace_event_call *call)
-{
-       call->flags &= ~TRACE_EVENT_FL_FILTERED;
-}
-
 static void filter_disable(struct ftrace_event_file *file)
 {
        struct ftrace_event_call *call = file->event_call;
 
        if (call->flags & TRACE_EVENT_FL_USE_CALL_FILTER)
-               call_filter_disable(call);
+               call->flags &= ~TRACE_EVENT_FL_FILTERED;
        else
                file->flags &= ~FTRACE_EVENT_FL_FILTERED;
 }
-- 
1.5.5.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to